Barcode 4008258276006 · food
Mango
Seeberger
100g
30/100
Forkin Score
Broader than nutrition-only: the score starts with nutrition, then applies transparent processing, additive and public-health adjustments.
How this score was calculated
- Base Nutri-Score 2023
- 54
- − NOVA 3 processing
- −4
- − Additive assessment
- −20
- Forkin Score
- 30/100
ANSES / Santé publique France
Monteiro et al. / NOVA
EFSA / JECFA
Methodology: forkin-score-2026-06 · Algorithm: nutriscore-2023-v2+nova-additives-iarc-2026-06 · Computed: 2026-07-15
Full methodology →NOVA describes how extensively a food was industrially processed; it is separate from nutritional composition.
A higher score indicates lower estimated pressure across climate, land, water and other lifecycle indicators.
Nutrition
What stands out
Watch closely
Carbohydrates
High
78.6 g
Sugar
High
66.3 g
Positive signals
Energy
Low
319 kcal
Fat
Low
1.2 g
Salt
Low
0.4 g
Saturated Fat
Low
0.3 g
Protein
Good
2.5 g
Fibre
Good
2.4 g
These cues compare nutrient density per 100 g using the same thresholds as the Forkin app. They are context, not personal dietary targets or medical advice.
Environment
Environmental Impact
Production-stage impact, shown with the same relative levels and illustrative everyday comparisons used in the Forkin app.
Environmental score
89/100
Food
per kgClimate Change
Low impact
Water scarcity
Moderate
Energy Depletion
Low impact
Depletion of Mineral Resources
Low impact
Land Use
Low impact
Ionizing Radiation
Low impact
The car, shower and phone-charge figures are illustrative comparisons, not exact measurements. Water is scarcity-weighted, not literal litres.
Land, mineral depletion and radiation are shown as relative levels because converting their impact units into physical area, mass or dose would be misleading. Agriculture and processing are included; transport, retail, cooking and disposal are not. See methodology.
Additives
Tap any E-code for the risk-level overview.